|
Well, well, well, so you're feeling brave, like a maverick. Congratulations.
You have finally come to your senses. You have finally figured out that
you will make more money as an artist selling 50,000 records on your own
record label, than selling 500,000 units as an artist signed to a major
record label. As stated in "Recording Royalties", an artist
will receive between 12 percent and 14 percent of the suggested retail
prices of cassettes and albums and about 10 percent of the cassette royalty
rate on CD's as compensation for their efforts of recording and album.
In the LOVE opinion, these percentages are too low and you should explore
the possibility of signing with an independent label.
Their Rationale:
Record companies blame low royalty rates on the non-success of nine out
of every ten records released. That's their percent success rate, one
that would be poor performance by any standard in any other industry.
Take General Motors, for instance. If they designed and manufactured ten
new cars, and only one out of those ten new designs sold and was profitable,
they would be out of business.
Our Rationale:
Record companies do take most of the risk in the beginning. So it seems
only fair that they enjoy the lion's share of the profits. The operative
word here is seems. If the artist's time, energy and emotions mattered
to labels, they wouldn't feel that they were the only ones taking risks.
But in all fairness, the record company, by signing an artist, is in a
sense giving the artist an unsecured loan. Both artist, is in a sense
giving the artist an unsecured loan. Both artist and record labels devote
their time, energy and resources to record, promote, market, and sell
music. The label has money as their most valuable resource, the artist
brings talent and creativity as a most valuable contribution. Which is
more valuable? We say artist, because artist can exist without record
companies, but record companies need something to sell. that something
is the artist's product.
Most record deals are negotiated so that the artist gets 12 to 14 percent
of the profits and the record company gets the remaining 88 percent. The
12 percent an artist receives is just not representative of the amount
of effort an artist puts into recording an album. It becomes blatantly
apparent when compared to the 88 percent of sales the record company gets
to keep. This is all the more reason to sign with an independent, small
label. We think it's safe to assume that most of us feel we have the same
one in ten chance of success as a major record label.
The only difference is that unless you are independently wealthy or have
investors willing to invest in you, record labels have more money available
to get the job done. From my perspective. they also have more money to
waste. While money is major concern when putting together an album, it
is not the be all end all. Money problems can be overcome. At that point,
the only thing a major label has over an independent is if a record is
a hit, they can sell more because of their distribution network. The flip
side of that is even if that same record were released on a major label
sold more you should still make less if your released in on an independent
label. With all things being equal, you'll make more money from the sales
of your record released on an independent label than you would if that
shame record were to be released on a label other than yours. That is,
of course unless your record is a flop. And in that case, no one make
any money. |