|
To successfully rank highly in
the search engines, the words on your Web pages should never be an
afterthought but a major investment in your search engine
optimization campaign.
After your keyword research to
find out how potential customers will search for your products and
services, writing search-engine-friendly copy should be the next
step in your optimization campaign. For non-competitive keyword
phrases, the writing on the page alone can often bring in high
rankings without any other special coding and Meta tagging. Once
you've become familiar with the ins and outs of such writing, you'll
be ready to focus on your title, description, and keywords-phrases
tags, and other elements making up the header underlying your home
page and other significant sections of your web site.
BACKGROUND>>
The
world wide web (www), relative to the search engine community, has
changed drastically over the past few years. The most radical, but least obvious change is that the search
engines no longer search the web as they did initially. The
reason for this is because there are so many pages (over 10 billion)
on so many sites (over 240 million), each search engine and
directory can only attempt to keep up with a limited percentage of
the whole web, so they just try to keep up their end of things.
Sometimes several of them will band together to share information on
products, services and information, but on the whole, each one is
autonomous, doing as good a job as they possibly can. (Google only
indexes four billion pages.)
The second major shift in doing business has been much more obvious,
especially to those of us in the business. Whereas in the beginning,
all search engines and directories were open to free and quickly
achieved registrations, over a period of several years, most of the
freedom and quickness slowly evaporated. The quickness was the first
casualty. Sometime in 1999 the rate of new web sites gained acute
status at around 15,000 per day. The search engines couldn't keep
up. Some, like AOL and MSN, stopped accepting registrations
themselves, turning instead to others for new information. The
major SE's took longer and longer for submissions to become full
registrations. Days became weeks, and weeks became months.
Quite often, submissions had to be done over and over again before
registrations actualized.
Something had to give, and that something was freedom. The
search engines started to charge for registrations. Paid for
inclusion satisfies two needs, namely the need for the SE community
to turn a profit, or at least cover costs, and the need to cull out
the personal or otherwise relatively unimportant web sites. And this
change did not happen overnight. It happened over about a year
to a year and a half, coincident in time with the stock market
collapse of the dot coms.
Four years ago, my manual registration list for search engines and
directories looked like this: Canada.com (to get more quickly to AOL
recognition), Infoseek, Lycos, Alta Vista, HotBot, Excite, DirectHit,
LookSmart, MSN, Netscape, Yahoo, The Yellow Pages, NBCi, the Open
Directory Project (ODP), ComFind and NrthernLight. Within this
same time frame, FAST at alltheweb.com came on the scene, as did
Google, Teoma and Inktomi. Those who bit the dust include
Canada.com, Excite, DirectHit, Infoseek, NBCi and NorthernLight.
The Yellow Pages, AOL, MSN and Netscape have become sub-repositories
of sites listed with the Online Database Project (ODP).
As I write this article, only Google, Yahoo, AOL’s Yellow Pages,
InfoUSA and the ODP are still open to free registrations. The
ODP takes months and months to recognize new registrations.
This is very frustrating to those of us in the search engine
optimization (SEO) business as well as being doubly frustrating to
clients.
Full report:
for
all of you who want to know
An eon ago in Internet time, but
only a few months ago for us humans, we started receiving offers,
for various fees and such, to assist us in getting our clients
to the top of the search engine results on keyword searches. We were
intrigued to say the least. Maybe you have also received such
email and wondered what they were talking about.
Let’s get back to the matter
of email solicitations for search engine results on keyword
searches. How can they offer so much we asked ourselves? As often as
not we would mutually agree that it was all hog-wash, absolutely
impossible to accomplish, and go on about our business of serving
you, our clients, in the best ways we know how. But in the back of
our minds these offers continued to perplex us. No one could
guarantee results, could they?
As the designated hitter on
search engine business for 310 Web Design Studio, I researched the
web again for whatever answers there were. I re-visited all of the
search engines and read again what they each had to say about their
criteria for url inclusion and placement -nothing new. I then went
back to the World Wide Web Consortium in Switzerland where Tim
Bernerds Lee (the inventor of the Web and HTML) and his team of web
wizards, which include Marc Andreessen (true genius and technical
founder of Netscape), and who form most of the rules governing how
web sites should be created and managed. Again, nothing new.
Finally, I again visited with the Dublin Core Group, the American
counterpart to the W3C.org, an organization that also helps to
promulgate rules for better web sites, among which are the
recommended elements for your "headers".
These two groups are a
significant authority for all professional web designers and search
engine pursuers. Would you believe it? Nothing new in the way
of information that would lead us as professionals to better do the
job we have done for you in terms of placement results on keyword
searches with the search engines. I even spoke (emailed) with Danny
Sullivan and Robin Nobles, the two most obvious search engine
specialists in our industry, but found out that they too were
perplexed at these claims of guaranteed results. (Wait till
they read what I'm getting to here.)
This information is important to
your getting the final picture on GUARANTEED RESULTS. The area of
interest for the search engines and directories on your site is
called the header or <head>. In either Internet Explorer or
Netscape the <head> can be seen on your home page by going to
the top-most control bar, and accessing "View". In IE,
access Source, in NN access Page Source. What you and the
search engines see in the first part of the "code" is the
<head>. Now some
of the search engines read all of the meta tag elements, some do
not. For those that do not we have added the http-equiv as the last
element in order to appeal to the search engines that do not read
the meta name tags.
Now we come to the crux of this
report to you, our clients. After you've seen the emails telling you
that you do not have to pay if the results GUARANTEED to you do not
happen with each search engine you choose, it takes some thinking to
figure out just what the gambit is here. As professionals, we know
that this promise is too good to be true, but what is going on?
Here it is: The company who has
had us so puzzled requires the site owner to pay $300 per URL per
top ten position on a keyword search, and $100 per URL for a top 20
position. After working in the area of e-commerce, and specializing
in search engine registrations for over a year, my experience is
that out of ten registration efforts, two or three will reach the
top ten when using any of the major search engine companies and
searching for keyphrases or pairs of keywords relative to the site.
Another two or three will reach the top 20. The other four or
five registration efforts fall between the cracks for a number of
reasons during the first attempt.
For those who GUARANTEE results,
it is all a matter of numbers, dollar numbers. It's just that
simple. The people who promise results are not privy to a knowledge
base of magic denied the rest of us. No way! If only two hit the top
ten with 18 search engines and directories, as they normally would,
that's $10,800. Another three in the top 20 yields $5,400. These
people couldn't care less about the other five registrations that
did not take hold. They've gotten what they came after - the url
owner's money - at a price we would not dream of charging. A very
clever business model, eh?
The way some companies can
advertise "top 10/20 position for search engine results, or you
don't pay" is simply a business model that is profitable
because of the 20-30% of companies that actually do achieve the top
positioning (and who knows for how long), they get paid enough to
compensate for the 70-80% that don't. Their results are
the same as ours, it's just that our customers pay a fraction of
what the GUARANTEE's are charging.
Let me close by saying that if
you are serious about doing business on the Internet, and I
certainly think you should be serious about the greatest market
potential any of us have ever seen, then you will respond positively
the next time I in contact you about redoing your
header to bring it in line with what the search engines are looking
for. Beverly Hills 310 and Web Design Studio give you your money's
worth.
On another front, the email
solicitation companies I have been writing about also mention a
"cloaking" technique that tailors your header code to
match the requirements of each search engine spider, thus resulting
in higher position results and preventing your competition from
seeing what is in your header. Heady stuff and a neat-o feature for
sure! Except that all of the search engines that pay any attention
to what your keywords are use the same criteria, the same from
search engine to search engine.
They look for a good title, one
that does not just say "Welcome to ABC - home page", but
goes the distance by saying "ABC - products and services
online" (whatever those products and services might be).
They look for a description
which can be reported back to searchers with the results. This
description should be appealing and information. Your site may very
well get accessed first because it is worded in such a way as to be
catchy. Search engines look for keywords and keyphrases which are
closely linked with what you sell or promote and appear in text on
your home page. Finally, search engines look for linkage from other
sites to your site. They figure, and rightly so, that if a lot of
people think your site is neat, then it probably is neat. Sites
benefiting from this analysis are AOL, MSN, Yahoo, and a few others.
This is a requirement hard for most of us to meet.
Good luck. Stay in touch. Remember, "We're all in this
together!"
William Orr
Marketing
310 Web Design Studio
|